Queen Elizabeth II Finally Supports Prince Charles As Commonwealth Head

Oh, the times they are changing. Queen Elizabeth II is finally supporting her son Prince Charles as her successor, but it might not be in the way you think.

According to People magazine, the Queen has publicly backed Prince Charles as the next Commonwealth leader. On Thursday, she officially asked the Commonwealth Heads of Government, to appoint her son Charles as her successor of the association of Britain and its former colonies. She has been the group’s figurehead since 1952. While the role a hereditary one, her asking for Charles to be appointed to the position will go a long way with the voting leaders of the group.

“It is my sincere wish that the Commonwealth will continue to offer stability and continuity for future generations and will decide that one day the Prince of Wales should carry on the important work started by my father in 1949. By continuing to treasure and reinvigorate our associations and activities, I believe we will secure a safer, more prosperous and sustainable world for those who follow us: a world where the Commonwealth’s generosity of spirit can bring its gentle touch of healing and hope to all,” the Queen said at the formal Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting at Buckingham Palace.

Unlike Britain’s throne, which Prince Charles is first in line for since he is the Queen’s oldest on, the Commonwealth Heads of Government are appointed. Who succeeds Queen Elizabeth II has to be voted on by the leaders, which is why her showing her support for Charles is so important.

Over the years, it has been no secret Queen Elizabeth II has had serious issues with her son, especially when it comes to his ability to be King. Although her new support does prove she now has more confidence in Prince Charles, it doesn’t necessarily mean she thinks he is fit to be king. Still, it is nice to see her support and believe him after all the decades of drama. At one point, there were rumors she wanted to give the throne to Prince William, not her son, but that was never proven to be true.

Source: Read Full Article