People with disabilities ‘left out of decisions about their lives’

People with disabilities are being left out of decisions about their lives, with the agency that runs the National Disability Insurance Scheme admitting it has relied too much on others to make decisions on people’s behalf.

A paper released by the National Disability Insurance Agency says there is a long history of people with disabilities not being supported or enabled to make decisions for themselves.

Colin Hiscoe from Reinforce Self Advocacy wants all information about the NDIS to be provided in plain English.Credit:Paul Jeffers

The NDIS Act 2013 recognises that decision-making is a human right for people with disabilities.

However, the agency said the current environment is often weighted towards substitute decision-making, where someone such as a nominee or guardian has authority to make decisions on behalf of an adult with a disability.

Participants with Down syndrome are most likely to have a nominee (69 per cent), while 43 per cent of participants with intellectual disability have a nominee.

The agency says nominees are being appointed when they might not be necessary.

About 60 per cent of adult NDIS participants have a disability that means they might require some support to make decisions. However, the paper says there is not much information or support for parents, carers and professionals to help them make these decisions.

“Because of this, people with cognitive impairment are often left out of decisions about their lives,” the paper says.

The agency says there can be a conflict of interest between the disability service provider and the wishes of the person with a disability.

It says, for example, some residents in group homes are not included in decisions – such as weekly menus, meals and activities – that could interrupt the house routine.

The paper also says young people turning 18 are not well supported to move to independently engaging with the NDIS, which means many parents continue to act as representatives, sometimes without consent.

Colin Hiscoe is a volunteer and former president of Reinforce Self Advocacy, an organisation run by and for people with intellectual disabilities to help them speak up for themselves. He said all information about the NDIS must be provided in plain English, using language that is clear, short and easy to understand.

“There is too much jargon and not enough pictures,” Mr Hiscoe said. “Please try and make things as simple as you possibly can.”

Mr Hiscoe also said National Disability Insurance Agency staff should focus on the person with a disability in interviews, rather than their support co-ordinator, advocate, family member or carer.

“Please try and let the person with a disability answer your questions,” he said. “If they’ve got somebody there with them, and they’re jumping in every five minutes, say, ‘Excuse me, I’m talking to [the person with a disability] and not to you.’ ”

The agency is seeking feedback on a new policy to ensure NDIS participants play a bigger role.

Catherine McAlpine, chief executive of Inclusion Australia, the national peak body for intellectual disability, said a policy was critical and overdue.

“At the moment people in group homes frequently don’t get to choose who they live with,” she said. “If a spot becomes open in a house, the service provider or family usually decides who comes and lives there.”

Ms McAlpine said people who help NDIS participants make decisions should be independent of the disability service providers.

A report on outcomes for NDIS participants in June last year found people with Down syndrome were less likely to choose who supports them (12.8 per cent compared to 44.5 per cent of all participants), choose what they do each day (15 per cent compared to 53.8 per cent) and make most decisions in their life (3.8 per cent compared to 38.6 per cent).

“People with Down syndrome are often not supported to be involved in their own decision-making,” said Dr Ellen Skladzien, chief executive of Down Syndrome Australia.

“This is a step forward in ensuring that people with a disability get a say.”

Sarah Forbes, an advocacy manager at the Victorian Advocacy League for Individuals with Disability, said getting supported decision-making right was the most critical element of the NDIS, but she was concerned there would not be funding to implement it.

The Morning Edition newsletter is our guide to the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up here.

Most Viewed in National

From our partners

Source: Read Full Article