Whistleblowing teacher wins £50,000 payout after tribunal win

Whistleblowing teacher, 53, fired after telling Ofsted that naughty children were ‘hidden away on squash courts’ and posting Facebook comments about the headmaster wins £50,000 payout

  • Ged Thomas, 53, was fired after blowing whistle at Berwick Academy, Northum
  • He told Ofsted that naughty children had been ‘hidden away’ during inspection
  • He also posted critical comments about the then headteacher on Facebook
  • Employment tribunal previously ruled Mr Thomas had been unfairly dismissed
  • Now they have awarded Mr Thomas, a PE and Maths teacher, a £50,000 payout 

A whistleblowing teacher who was sacked after revealing that naughty school children were being ‘hidden away on the squash courts’ during an Ofsted inspection has been awarded a £50,000 payout.

Ged Thomas, 53, was fired from his role at the Berwick Academy, Northumberland, after making the claim to Ofsted. He also posted critical comments about then headteacher Alexis Widdowson on Facebook.

The school claimed the remarks were ‘derogatory or offensive about the school’ and breached its social media policy and code of conduct. 

Mr Thomas, a PE and Maths teacher, later took the academy to a tribunal claiming unfair dismissal after his 2018 sacking.

Ms Widdowson, meanwhile, resigned before the damning report – which labelled the academy as ‘inadequate’ – was published.

Employment judges later ruled that Mr Thomas was unfairly dismissed – due to what the tribunal heard was the school’s ‘deeply flawed’ internal disciplinary investigation.

Now Mr Thomas has been awarded a £50,000 payout by employment judges. 

Ged Thomas (pictured) told Ofsted that unruly pupils were kept hidden away from inspectors during a visit to ‘inadequate’ Berwick Academy, in Northumberland

The PE and Maths teacher was later sacked by the academy after he posted critical comments about headteacher Alexis Widdowson (pictured) on Facebook

In January 2018, Mr Thomas had contacted Ofsted to warn them that unruly pupils were kept hidden away from inspectors during visit to the school.

The inspectors later deemed the school to be ‘inadequate’ – the lowest level on the scale.

At the initial hearing, employment Judge Tudor Garnon said: ‘[Mr Thomas] received text messages from a colleague and parents saying certain pupils, who were known for misbehaving, had been removed from lessons to the squash courts out of sight of the inspection team.

‘Hiding children from Ofsted inspectors would almost certainly amount to concealment of information which tends to show relevant failures.

‘That for him was the last straw. He formally raised his concerns to Ofsted through their online school teachers portal, whilst sitting in his car.’

The school tried to claim during the hearing that the social media posts were the only reason Mr Thomas had been sacked, not his whistleblowing.

However, a Newcastle employment tribunal found they were not an ‘indication of disloyalty’ and ruled the internal investigation leading to Mr Thomas’s dismissal was ‘deeply flawed’.

Mr Thomas made the social media comments on The Berwick Advertiser’s Facebook page under a link to an article about Ms Widdowson’s departure.

The Tribunal heard that replying to another commenter, he talked about Ms Widdowson’s ‘ability to manipulate, persuade, bully and lie’.

He also said she had a ‘failed approach to behaviour management, teaching and learning, staff management and leadership’.

The comments were reported to the school and Mr Thomas was dismissed. Academy chiefs claimed the social media posts were ‘the sole reason for dismissal’. 

But the panel concluded that making the negative social media comments had not been an ‘indication of any disloyalty’ to his employers. 

Bosses at the academy (pictured) claimed the social media posts, which they judged as derogatory or offensive, were ‘the sole reason for dismissal’

And in a 44-page judgment, the tribunal found the school’s policy on social media use and whistleblowing was overly ‘complex’ and ‘it was inevitable there would be disagreement on whether they were complied with fully.’ 

Judge Garnon upheld Mr Thomas’ claims for wrongful dismissal, unfair dismissal, compensation for untaken annual leave and breach of contract relating to missing property. 

Awarding the compensation, Judge Garnon said: ‘I found [Mr Thomas] was not guilty of gross misconduct because any breach of lawful and reasonable instructions was not an indication of his disloyalty to, or wish to harm, the Academy as such, therefore not a fundamental breach of his contract.’

He awarded £4,002 for breach of contract, £42,827 for unfair dismissal and a further £3,293 for untaken annual leave. 

The school, which has around 600 pupils and serves the town and rural area of Berwick-upon-Tweed in North Northumberland, is now under the leadership of Tracy Hush.   

It has been in special measures since the ‘inadequate’ inspection in 2018. 

But in the latest check-up, carried out in May this year, acknowledged there had been ‘significant changes’ to the the school’s leadership team and inspectors praised those in charge for ‘taking effective action to provide education in the current circumstances’.

MailOnline has contacted Mr Thomas and the Berwick Academy for comment. 

In a previous statement, released following the outcome of the tribunal, Donna Goddard, Chair and Parent Trustee at Berwick Academy, said: ‘We are disappointed with the Employment Tribunal’s decision that Mr Thomas was unfairly dismissed, particularly in view of its findings regarding his high degree of contributory fault towards his dismissal.

‘We wish to emphasise that the Tribunal rejected Mr Thomas’ principal argument that he was dismissed for publicly raising concerns or ‘blowing the whistle’, as the Academy has robustly maintained throughout.

‘This judgment relates to legal proceedings which have been ongoing since 2018, in respect of events which took place under previous Senior Leadership Teams.

‘The Academy wishes to move forward and continue working with relevant stakeholders to deliver the highest standards of education to its current and future pupils.’

Bosses said the school had carried out an investigation into Mr Thomas’ claims that school children had been hidden, but found ‘no evidence’ to substantiate the allegations.

Source: Read Full Article